Funny Moments

Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras: Wimbledon fourth round, 2001 (Extended Highlights)





Total Video Views: 1737648



SUBSCRIBE to The Wimbledon YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/wimbledon

LIKE Wimbledon on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Wimbledon

FOLLOW Wimbledon on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Wimbledon

FOLLOW Wimbledon on Snapchat: add Wimbledon

VISIT: http://www.wimbledon.com/

This is the official YouTube page of The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Championships), home of Wimbledon. The Championships 2018 will run from 2 July – 15 July.

37 thoughts on “Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras: Wimbledon fourth round, 2001 (Extended Highlights)”

  1. How many Wimbledon titles would Sampras have won if he was playing today and had to face Murray, Nadal, the Djoker and of course Roger? He will be lucky to win One..

  2. This is Federer's original game! Influenced by Serve and Volley, like Pistol Pete. This is such a great match to watch and learn one of the most effective strategies used in tennis

  3. I prefer young Federer with less topspin that gave opponents less time to react to his ridiculous placement. Maybe he did it to cope with Nadal on clay but I prefer the old style. His serve has gotten smoother though, looked a bit Sjeng Schalkenish here.

  4. 萬乘之國,兵不可以無主,土地博大,野不可以無吏,百姓殷眾,官不可
    以無長,操民之命,朝不可以無政。地博而國貧者,野不辟也,民眾而兵
    弱者,民無取也。故末產不禁,則野不辟。賞罰不信,則民無取。野不辟
    ,民無取,外不可以應敵,內不可以固守,故曰有萬乘之號,而無千乘之
    用,而求權之無輕,不可得也。地辟而國貧者,舟輿飾,臺榭廣也。賞罰
    信而兵弱者,輕用眾,使民勞也。舟車飾
    ,臺榭廣,則賦斂厚矣。輕用眾,使民勞,則民力竭矣。賦斂厚,則下怨
    上矣。民力竭,則令不行矣。下怨上,令不行,而求敵之勿謀己,不可得
    也。欲為天下者,必重用其國,欲為其國者,必重用其民,欲為其民者,
    必重盡其民力。無以畜之,則往而不可止也;無以牧之,則處而不可使也
    ;遠人至而不去,則有以畜之也。民眾而可一,則有以牧之也。見其可也
    ,喜之有徵。見其不可也,惡之有刑。賞罰信於其所見,雖其所不見,其
    敢為之乎?見其可也,喜之無徵;見其不

  5. How I wish these two great players were in the same generation. What I would not have given to see a Federer in his Prime play a Sampras in his Prime in wimbledon in the 90s. Serve and Volley Vs All Court. Sigh!

  6. My two favorite tennis players, I will always think back then that Sampras should have won that game… because Federer did not win that year Wimbledon and Sampras could have if it wasn't for Federer… ohhh well what an mixed fealings

  7. Interesting how Federers face has changed quite a bit from 2001 to 2018. His teeth gumline has receded quite a bit and his chin has grown dramatically! Hmmm how does that happen?

  8. Little did we know what this man was about to do in the next 17+ years. "First man ever to win 8 wimbledon singles title", only mistake the comentator made was say Pete Sampras instead of his opponent. No disrespect to Pistol who is an all time great.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *